The Clash of Trade Ideologies: Revisiting the Battle of Liaoluo Bay through the Lens of Hans Putmans’ Interpretation of Vrijen Handel and the Ming Tributary System

By Lap Kan AU, PhD student, National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU)

Abstract: This paper examines Hans Putmans’ interpretation of vrijen handel (free trade) within the framework of the Dutch East India Company, contrasting it with the Ming Empire’s tributary system. The study argues that Putmans’ concept of vrijen handel must be understood in the context of the early seventeenth century. Only through this historical lens can we fully grasp the ideological conflict between vrijen handel and the tributary system, as well as its role in precipitating the Battle of Liaoluo Bay in 1633. The significance of this research lies in its potential to reshape our understanding of early modern trade interactions, offering new insights into how ideological conflicts shape trade practices and historical events. By analyzing these interactions, the study deepens our comprehension of VOC-Ming trade relations within the broader context of colonial expansion

Keywords: vrijen handel, free trade, Battle of Liaoluo Bay, tributary system, Ming Empire, Dutch East India Company, VOC, vrijhandel, Mare Liberum

Edited by Birgit Schneider

Special thanks to the anonymous peer reviewers.

For full article: 

© 2025 The Middle Ground Journal (ISSN: 2155-1103) Number 28, Fall 2024/Winter 2025 http://TheMiddleGroundJournal.org

See Submission Guidelines page for the journal’s not-for-profit educational open-access policy.

The Middle Ground Journal's logo is its name with an image of a book open to a map of the world.
Posted in ,